Zoom in

Start Tracking (coming soon)
49 of 49 people found the following review helpful:
Some of the things I didn't like (and why I didn't give the book a higher rating):
1) Constant references to his last book regarding key ideas and terminology. 2) Lack of specific references for further independent research (this really hurts his arguments for he cites many studies throughout the text) 3) What appears to be a lack of consideration for some other historical events that spurred change (for example WWII had a major role in the spurring of certain new technologies). 4) His incredible optimism that events will unfold exactly as described, in the time frame mentioned. 5) Some parts of the book seem either like old news or self-evident (see his explaination on page 251 of why some declining neighborhoods regenerate).
Overall, it's a good read and one will find Dent's ideas and philosophy interesting. I hope his vision comes true (for all of us).
34 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
Dent's current projections for the Dow Jones Industrials is 41,500 by 2008, whereas he now expects the Nasdaq to reach 45,000 by the same date. Were this to occur, the total stock market capitalization would exceed $101 trillion (currently around $14-$16 trillion)! Were the nominal Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to grow at a rate of approximately 6.5%, including a real GDP rate of 4.0% (Greenspan's best-case target) and inflation of 2.5% (Fed's and GAO estimate), the nominal GDP would reach $17 trillion in 2008.
The ratio of total stock market capitalization to nominal GDP would reach 600%! The figure at the most recent highs was 185%. At the peaks in 1929, 1973, and 1987, the figures were 81%, 70%, and 64% respectively. At the height of Japan's bubble market in December 1989, this figure topped 150%. (The average of the past 129 years in the U.S. has been 50%.) This suggests that the ratio will TRIPLE in the next eight years. How can this happen? Answer: It cannot.
Dent predicted a real estate market crash (30%-50%) in the U.S. in 1994-95, based on his demographic analysis. This was a fundamental blunder.
Dent predicted in late 1997 and early 1998 that the Fed would raise rates in 1998, that the long bond yield would hit 7.25%, and that large-cap stocks would correct and recover but underperform small stocks. Such a failed prediction calls into question his very understanding of the business and interest rate cycles.
There should be no doubt in any reader's mind the dubious nature of Dent's methodology and therefore his projections. More than anything, Dent is an expert marketer of Harry Dent, genius, forecaster extraordinaire.
When the market flattens out or takes a massive dive in the decade or more ahead, Dent will be watching from his Puerto Rican plantation estate where he moved in 1998. I'll leave it to you to figure out why he would move from a spectacular beachside mansion in Half Moon Bay, CA to the Caribbean when he did . . .
26 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
Because I am a librarian, I came across this book by accident when filling a request for one of my patrons. I took a quick look at it and then decided I needed to get my own copy.
Whether or not you believe all of the predictions in this book, it is still a fascinating read and gives one plenty of food for thought. I don't read very many non-fiction books, but this one certainly grabbed my attention.
12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
http://csf.colorado.edu/authors/Alexander.Mike/spendwav.gif
As that graph shows, the spending wave 'worked' for 1929 too. But Dent's predictions really changed between The Great Boom Ahead and The Roaring 2000's. He projects a Dow of 23K to 35K by 2007-2010! He ignored the *level* predicted by his model and simply extrapolated the recent rate of rise to the 2007-2010 date his timing projects. This is a critical error (there could be an intervening bear market between now and 2007 for example). If you focus on the levels predicted using his methods you arrive at the conclusions that the bull market would end in the neighborhood of 1450 (in 1999 dollars) on the S&P500, which means it has ended already. One can interpret this result as a bear market is interposed between now and 2007 so that the index is only getting back to the prior peak (in real terms) by 2007 as Dent's model projects. Mr. Dent should have mentioned this in the Roaring 2000's. As a result I award 5 stars for the originality of the idea and the presentation, but only 1 star for the accuracy of his prediction for an overall three stars. I recommend the book Stock Cycles for a more careful projection of stock returns over the next 20 years.
21 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
And I did what almost every normal person with little time on his hands does .... I put the book in my book case and did not read it.
Six months went by, and Laura, my youngest daughter (26) came to visit for a couple of days and asked to borrow the book.
Two days went by and Laura called me and asked if I thought Mr. Dent was on the money in his predictions. She was surprised to hear that I have not read the book yet, and made me swear that I will buy another copy and read it, and I did. This took place in October 1999.
After reading this book, I was a believer that technology will lead us to better places and I started investing heavily in the stock market. At the same time, I read another excellent book on short-term trading, "Stock Trading Wizard" by Tony Oz, and he talked about cost averaging for long-term growth. He wrote about the QQQ which tracks tech stocks (nasdaq 100 index) and I started buying into this stock. I also bought other tech issues and on the morning of January 2, 2000, I sold half my portfolio for more money than I initially invested. I took my initial investment off the table, plus some profits, and I have the rest invested in QQQ for long-term growth. I am staying with technology.
I want to thank Mr. Dent as it was for him that I saw the opportunity. I still think that his predictions will come true, and I have my money where his mouth is.
So if you believe him or not, I think you should read it. So far, I have more than 250,000 reasons to believe him.
