Zoom in
47 of 49 people found the following review helpful:
It certainly seems so in the two intertwined stories told in this book. The first, based on dual murders that actually took place in the 1800s, is the story of a Norwegian woman who is transplanted to a desolate and uninhabited New England island by her fisherman husband, there to live for many years with little or no human companionship under the harshest of circumstances. Her life is so rigid, so devoid of any tenderness or care, so barren (the fact that she cannot conceive a child is a metaphor for her entire existence) that her ultimate tragedy seems inevitable.
The second story is that of Thomas, a poet whose entire ouvre is limited to one collection of brilliant poems, an outpouring of grief and emotion about his first love, tragically killed in a car accident. Married to a photojournalist, Jean, Thomas seems half a person--desperately trying to regain his art, but in his way as barren as Maren, the lonely Norwegian wife. His only real joy is his and Jean's precocious and adorable 5-year-old daughter, Billie, whose mere existence has kept her parents in their difficult marriage. As Thomas and Billie accompany Jean on a photo assignment that will document the historic facts of the murders that changed a small group of Norwegian immigrants forever, Thomas seems to be unraveling. Situated with the others on a schooner piloted by his brother, Rich, Thomas seems to be a cypher, only alive in brief spurts punctuated by interactions with Billie and Rich's flirtatious girlfriend.
The steady unraveling of Thomas's sanity (and thus his marriage), juxtaposed against the story of Maren's own unraveling, makes for a heavy reading experience. And yet the book is so well written, and so insightful, that it moves along very quickly toward its inevitable and tragic ending.
Highly recommended, especially when paired with "The Last Time They Met," which should be read second, although I inadvertently reversed the order.
37 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
44 of 48 people found the following review helpful:
Based on true events, the murder is narrated by the survivor, Maren, who wrote a narrative document that Jean pinches from the local historical society. The tension of Maren's story concerns her loveless marriage, her frail (at best) relationships with her sister Karen and her sister-in-law Anethe, and her deep love for her brother Evan.
BOTH stories have the potential to be interesting. I began the novel with high hopes. However, neither story really pays off. For the whodunit to work, there would need to be more tension. You start to suspect the murderer's true identity too early, and ultimately you find that none of the characters in this story are very sympathetic. Plus, a key element to caring about this story is to know more about why Maren adores her brother so much--we get a very veiled hint, and that's about it.
The present-day story also suffers from a lack of sympathetic characters. Jean is interesting, but when her character stumbles (I won't reveal how) late in the novel, the question is WHY she reacts in this manner rather than delving deeper into her problems with her poet husband. The brother-in-law and his girlfriend come across as too one-dimensional, although they are supposed to be pivotal characters in the relationship between Jean and her husband.
A lot happens in this novel--a murder story is resolved, Jean comes to a point of personal crisis, and a death occurs in Jean's story (again, I won't tell you who). But the narrative is so flat (and slow, at times) that it's difficult to remain attentive, much less sympathetic.
I can't imagine not finishing this book once you start it, but it's difficult to imagine being drawn in by any of these characters.
24 of 25 people found the following review helpful:
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
